Search for: "CONSUMER ECONOMIC LOSS PLAINTIFFS"
Results 1 - 20
of 948
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2019, 11:29 am
Where a commercial plaintiff suffered only economic damages due to the purchase of allegedly defective trucks, its fraud claim was barred by the economic loss doctrine. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
The economic loss doctrine prohibits a party, which is seeking only damages for economic loss, from recovering those damages pursuant to a tort cause of action. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 11:12 am
That's pretty bad.Simple rule #1: If you didn’t buy the product, you can’t claim economic loss from purchasing it.But that’s not all. [read post]
23 May 2013, 7:45 am
Parker brought its claims on behalf of a damages class, with an economic loss damages subclass for property in which the PrimeTrim had been damaged but not other property. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 2:20 am
Stated differently, the consumer has only suffered an economic loss. [read post]
13 May 2009, 2:01 pm
Therefore, the economic loss rule was not applicable. [read post]
7 May 2015, 5:00 am
Dec. 22, 2011) (“Plaintiffs essentially are claiming that their purchases, ipso facto, caused an economic loss. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 2:44 am
Steven Whalen, holding that Michigan's economic loss doctrine barred common law fraud claims in consumer fraud litigation. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 11:05 am
Yesterday, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed dismissal – for failure to state a claim – of TPP economic loss claims in the Trasylol litigation. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:49 am
Plaintiff contended that its negligence claim fell within this "other property" exception to the economic loss doctrine. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 3:22 am
Stated differently, the consumer has only suffered an economic loss. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 6:48 am
This will help prevent plaintiffs from dressing up warranty claims against typical product sellers as negligent misrepresentation claims evading the doctrine of economic loss. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:55 pm
Supreme Court case on the economic loss doctrine, East River Steamship Corp. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:19 pm
They now like pure economic loss claims. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
As the court noted, “most state courts construe their consumer protection statutes to permit recovery beyond actual damages, including incidental and consequential damages,” which would generally permit lost time claims.Nonetheless, plaintiffs who bought their cars before July 10, 2009—the date on which New GM purchased most of the assets of Old GM as part of the bankruptcy proceedings—couldn’t pursue claims for economic loss,… [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Oct. 21, 1988) (“the purpose of the Act is to provide for restitution for economic loss”).District of ColumbiaPersonal injuries are not mentioned in the list of remedies under the DC act. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:16 am
Stated differently, the consumer has only suffered an economic loss. [read post]
3 May 2007, 6:06 am
Harris Two recent cases in Oregon involved the Economic Loss Doctrine as well. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 3:08 am
The Court specifically left unanswered whether or not tort or contract law applies to a product that poses a risk of causing personal injuries or property damage, but has caused only economic loss to the product itself. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:54 am
A quick review of the complaint reveals the dubiousness of the plaintiff's claims and, more importantly, demonstrates the sheer avarice underlying these sorts of "economic loss" class actions in the product liability context generally. [read post]
